University of Bohol Employees Work Engagement: Measuring Workplace Productivity



Theories on work engagement posited that engaged employees are physically, cognitively, and emotionally driven to attain the organizational goals. Thus, they produce high levels of workplace productivity. Workplace productivity indexes serve as a parameter that measures how satisfactorily employees are doing and what motivates them to achieve higher goals and higher levels of efficiency and effectiveness. This study aimed to determine the level of work engagement of the human capital of the university as measured by workplace productivity. A quantitative-descriptive method with the use of the Workplace Productivity Snapshot Tool was utilized in the conduct of the research. The data collected were analyzed and interpreted using simple percentage, weighted mean, one-way Analysis of Variance. Results showed that the UB employees were highly productive in building leadership and management capability, organizing work, networking, and collaboration and measuring what matters. However, they are moderately productive in creating productive workplace cultures, encouraging innovation, and the use of technology and investing in people and skills. Workplace Productive Snapshot Tool yielded moderately productive as those needing continuing feedback, monitoring, and evaluation to keep up with individual and environmental challenges. Based on the salient findings, it is elemental to determine the learning and development needs. Such will enable the employee to improve performance and achieve higher workplace productivity continually.

Full Text: PDF


Ahmed, A. A., Abu-Naser, S. S., El Talla, S. A., & Al Shobaki, M. J. (2018). The Impact of Information Technology Used on the Nature of Administrators Work at Al-Azhar University in Gaza. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. (2013). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The international journal of human resource management, 24(2), 330-351. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 7, 2019).
Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265-269. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 7, 2019).
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 7, 2019).
Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67-75. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Bellou, V. (2010). Organizational culture as a predictor of job satisfaction: the role of gender and age. Career Development International, 15(1), 4-19. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Castro, V. F. D. (2016). A framework to identify, measure and benchmark operations management best practices. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 19, 2019).
Dartey-Baah, K., & Amoako, G. K. (2011). Application of Frederick Herzberg's Two-Factor theory in assessing and understanding employee motivation at work: a Ghanaian Perspective. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 1-8. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 13, 2019).
Duffy, G., & Gallagher, T. (2017). Shared Education in contested spaces: How collaborative networks improve communities and schools. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 107-134. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L., Shcherbak, V., & Nifatova, O. (2017). Managing a project of competitive-integrative benchmarking of higher educational institutions. Eastern-European journal of enterprise technologies. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 19, 2019).
Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., Sisodia, R., & Nordfält, J. (2017). Enhancing customer engagement through consciousness. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 55-64. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 19, 2019).
Ibrahim, R., Boerhannoeddin, A., & Bakare, K. K. (2017). The effect of soft skills and training methodology on employee performance. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(4), 388-406. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Knight, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: an experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well-being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(2), 158. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 1, 2019).
Kompaso, S. M., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), p89. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 13, 2019).
Lottrup, L., Stigsdotter, U. K., Meilby, H., & Claudi, A. G. (2015). The workplace window view: a determinant of office workers’ work ability and job satisfaction. Landscape Research, 40(1), 57-75. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 7, 2019).
Masa'deh, R. E., Almajali, D. A., Alrowwad, A. A., & Obeidat, B. (2019). THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE IN ENHANCING JOB SATISFACTION: A DEVELOPING COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management, 14. Retrieved from Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Neves, P., & Eisenberger, R. (2014). Perceived organizational support and risk taking. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), 187-205. (Accessed last August 14, 2019).
Papay, J. P., & Kraft, M. A. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 26, 2019).
Parakhina, V., Godina, O., Boris, O., & Ushvitsky, L. (2017). Strategic management in universities as a factor of their global competitiveness. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(1), 62-75. Retrieved from (Accessed last July 19, 2019).
Rozylowicz, L., Nita, A., Manolache, S., Ciocanea, C. M., & Popescu, V. D. (2017). Recipe for success: A network perspective of partnership in nature conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 38, 21-29. Retreived from (Accessed last July 18, 2019).
Schaufeli, W., &Salanova, M. (2011). Work engagement: On how to better catch a slippery concept. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 39-46.Retrieved from, (Accessed last August 7, 2019).
Stello, C. M. (2011). Herzberg’s two-factor theory of job satisfaction: An integrative literature review. In Unpublished paper presented at The 2011 Student Research Conference: Exploring Opportunities in Research, Policy, and Practice, University of Minnesota Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 13, 2019).
Suojanen, I. (2012). Work for your happiness-Theoretical and empirical study defining and measuring happiness at work. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 29, 2019).
Tan, T. H., & Waheed, A. (2011). Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and job satisfaction in the Malaysian retail sector: The mediating effect of love of money. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 13, 2019).
Van der Voordt, T., & Riratanaphong, C. (2014). Measuring the added value of workplace change. Comparison between Theory and Practice. Retrieved from (Accessed last August 26, 2019).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.